Coaching

My Philosophy: Why 'Coaching' Instead of 'Teaching'?

You may notice that I use the term 'coaching' to describe my work. This is a very deliberate choice that reflects the core of my philosophy.

While 'teaching' is a wonderful profession, the word can sometimes imply a one-way transfer of information—where the teacher holds the knowledge and the student's role is to receive it.

I prefer 'coaching' because it more accurately describes my client-centred approach, which is built on partnership and empowerment.

Here’s the difference:

• Coaching is collaborative: a coach works with you. We are partners. Your personal goals, your unique interests and learning style, and your aspirations are at the very centre of our work together.

• Coaching unlocks potential: my role isn't just to 'tell' you what to do. It's to provide the right tools and knowledge, ask the right questions, and create a supportive space for you to discover and refine your own skills. It's about drawing out your potential, not just drilling in information.

• Coaching fosters independence: a great coach's ultimate goal is to make themselves redundant. I'm here to help you become your own best guide, problem-solver, and artist.

Teaching can be about delivering a subject; coaching is about developing the whole person.